1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex787 [66]
3 years ago
14

The Warren Court’s decision about prayer in public schools outlawed all forms of prayer in public schools. silent prayers by ind

ividuals in public schools. prayers by small groups of students in public schools. official prayers in public schools.
History
2 answers:
sveta [45]3 years ago
7 0

The answer is: The Warren Court's decision about prayer in public schools outlawed official prayers in public schools.

In 1962 the Supreme Court ruled in the case <em>Engel v. Vitali </em>that the public schools in New York were no longer obligated to let all, or most of the students recite the 'Regents Prayer'. The ruling however did not rule out all prayers in schools because students are free to say for themselves whatever prayer they wish and the school or the government cannot punish students for  doing so. Neither can they force them to say prayers before starting the school day.

irga5000 [103]3 years ago
3 0

  The Warren Court's decision about prayer in public schools outlawed official prayers in public schools. It happened because official praying in public schools its considered a unconstitutional action, violating the the First Amendment  of U.S Constitution that guarantees the U.S citizens, on summary, freedom of religion, speech, press and association.

  The<u> </u><u>Engel v. Vitale (1962)</u> case has made public the issue concerning the recommendation, made in 1951 by State Board of Regents from New York to New York's public schools with the purpose of <em>"Statement on Moral and  Spiritual Training in Schools", </em>that encouraged daily reciting of prayers, during the morning. Though the prayers were not mandatory and considered denominational neutral, it still violated the excerpt of the Constitution that stated "Congress should make no law respecting an establishment of religion", because official praying itself its considered a religious activity.  Thus the outcome of the case was that State officials (such as the State Board of Regents) could not compose or incite the recitation of prayers in schools.

   

You might be interested in
Toussaint l'ouverture led a slave revolt that eventually created what nation
8090 [49]
<span>Toussaint l'ouverture led a slave revolt during the French revolution, unfortunately he died in a French prison before the success of the rebellion. lieutenant, Jean-Jacques Dessalines went on to declare Haiti's sovereignty on 1 January 1804.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
hich of the following is the most important political result of the election of 1800? It proved that the nations who thought the
mafiozo [28]
It demonstrated that the ideas in the U.S constitution were stronger than the ideas in of a political party. would be the right answer
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Explain Mr. Hays's arguments that the communist influence in other countries is different than in the United States.
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
Search it up in a test and try to find the right answer because i have no clue in what the united.1states
7 0
3 years ago
What happened to the unemployment rate after the stock market crash in 1929
Tamiku [17]
The depression originated in the United States, after a fall in stock prices that began around September 4, 1929, and became worldwide news with the stock market crash of October 29, 1929 (known as Black Tuesday). Between 1929 and 1932, worldwide GDP fell by an estimated 15%. By comparison, worldwide GDP fell by less than 1% from 2008 to 2009 during the Great Recession. Some economies started to recover by the mid-1930s. However, in many countries, the negative effects of the Great Depression lasted until the beginning of World War II.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A supreme court justice who does not agree with majority opinion of the court can write an
vaieri [72.5K]
If the Supreme Court Justice does not agree with the majority opinion, than the court can write a concurring opinion.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What limitations did the astrolabe have that the magnetic compass did not?
    12·1 answer
  • Which kingdoms are included in both Linnaean and Whittaker systems of classification? fungi, plant, and animal kingdoms protists
    8·1 answer
  • If private property rights were established in the air, there would probably be
    14·2 answers
  • What did the washington Naval Conference, the Nine-Power Treaty, and the Kellogg-Briand Pact have in common?
    12·2 answers
  • What factor(s) made it difficult for George Washington to recruit forces for the Continental army?
    14·2 answers
  • What nation was responsible for world war 1?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe some of the events that took place during the November 1923 "putsch" by Adolph Hitler? (Site 3)
    8·1 answer
  • What is the importance of the 17th amendment
    13·2 answers
  • Lester Maddox has been described as a vocal opponent of integration. This means that he
    13·2 answers
  • In a mixed-market economy, the government regulates business
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!