Here's link to the answer:
tinyurl.com/wtjfavyw
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
A. <span>It created widespread blending of cultures.
</span>That brief but thorough empire-building campaign changed the world: It spread Greek ideas and culture<span> from the Eastern Mediterranean to Asia. Historians call this era the “</span>Hellenistic<span> period.” (The word “</span>Hellenistic<span>” comes from the word Hellazein, which means “to speak Greek or identify with the Greeks.”)</span>
Answer:
c. signing the Camp David Accords
Explanation:
President Carter is one of the American Presidents that has a very good reputation and is bellowed in the nation because of his many good decisions and measures during his reign. He was also heavily included into solving international problems, such as the conflict between Israel and Egypt. Carter was the one that initiated the peace negotiations between the two nations, eventually managing to convince them to sign a treaty and stop the war. The treaty was signed in the White House and it is known as the Camp David Accords.
