<span>Many believed the Church needed to be reformed. In the 1500s Kings such as Charles V had a sole political strategy: centralisation. This 'centralisation' included forming one State religion throughout the empire. However followers of Calvin and Luther (generally Protestants) were not very pleased with this. God was in their eyes more important than the sovereign. A King strenghtening his centralisation policy of setting Catholicism as the sole religion, consequently sparked political conflicts in the empire as well.
For example, the area what we nowadays call Germany existed in that time from seperate semi-sovereign areas headed by a so-called 'elector'. Electors chose the ruling emperor/king. In 1555 the Peace of Augsburg was signed as a direct effect of the wars between the ultimate sovereign and the semi-sovereign electors. Charles V agreed upon the division of religion within his empire ("cuius regio, eius religio"): the ruler dictated the religion of the ruled in the seperate areas that made up the Holy Roman Empire (HRE).
So, the reformation led to warfare because of different ideas by the ruler and his people. That led to political conflict mainly because the people also didn't agree with the ruler's centralisation policy.</span>
Answer:
fjrjrhyrhrurhrubrhdbdhdbrb you are doing it
The answer is B. They could veto laws. This statement does not describe the Roman Senate since it was the Praetor Urbanus who could veto laws.
The answer is they had never experienced European
diseases before. Since they never encountered these kinds of diseases
before, their bodies had no resistance to them.
When they were exposed, the effect was devastating as many perished upon
contracting the diseases.
She mostly blames men because she states that they have enough power to change it. Wollstonecraft blames the women’s upbringings for some of their problems also. You can read this passage for more info.
