Answer:
4/1
Step-by-step explanation:
i believe thats right since 4/1 is a fraction and it can be simplified to 4
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Answer:
Step 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one is incorrect because you need to add 3 but it subtracted.
Answer:
x = 39.1
Step-by-step explanation:
mean = average off all the numbers =
sum of the numbers / amount of numbers.
35 = sum of the #'s / # of #'s
35 = 100.9 + x / 4
35 × 4 = 100.9 + x / 4 × 4
140 = 100.9 + x
140 – 100.9 = 100.9 + x – 100.9
39.1 = x
x = 39.1