I think that this question was asked by a bot made by brainly.
Answer:
1) Peace
2) Do you believe sustained world peace is possible? Why or why not?
Explanation:
There are two valid definitions of the word peace:
<em>Peace is a period in time without any conflicts similar to war. </em>
<em>Peace is the state of freedom that no one disturbs.</em>
<em />
World peace is possible in <u>theory</u>.
To achieve world peace all of the nations would have to relinquish dogma, religion and political beliefs.
Those are the three main reasons why people cannot have peace.
Similar topics are discussed in many Utopian books. Something similar was the main idea of communism at the beginning. In the perfect world without any conflict, everyone would have to live by the same rules, have equal rights and the same lifestyle. Still, there is a problem with this type of life and it lies in the efforts of society and individuals. For example, a person who goes to college would not have a better financial life than the person who did not go to college, thus the individual effort to stand out would be pointless.
<u>To conclude, world peace is possible in theory, but it is almost impossible to have it in practice.</u>
Defender of the subject
hope this helps
Answer:
B. all thirteen states had to obey it.
Explanation:
In the early stages of the Nation, they came upon an agreement where if 9 out of 13 states ratified the Constitution, all of them had to do it, many states did it promptly, but New York, the last state that ratified it, was a difficult part because a lot of anti-federalists pushed not to do so, including Governor George Clinton, all in all they ended up ratifyin it in mid-1788.
