Was this in reference to literal audio archives? If so, I don't see any cons beside possible copyright infringement.
If you're talking about the codecs themselves, then I can do that.
<span>Pros:
</span>- Widespread acceptance. Supported in nearly all hardware devices, and continually adopted by newer ones.
- Faster decoding. Much more so than FLAC, Vorbis, etc.
- Relaxed licensing schedule.
<span>Cons:
</span><span>
</span>- Lower quality and efficiency than most modern codecs. (To be fair, never really noticed this one).
- Sometimes the maximum bitrate isn't enough.
- Pretty much void/unusable for high definition audio (higher than <span>48kHz).</span>
Answer:
because it provides you a lot of storage and the post production equipment to handle it and it is used to do big projects
Explanation:
so l know this much it is correct please mark me brainllest
Answer:
Webcasts
Explanation:
The rest of the options don't need to be streamed as there isn't a continuous flow of information.
Haircut is my name on tictok
