C is the answer
Hope this helps
<u>Full question:</u>
On June 15, Harper purchased equipment for $100,000 from Imperial Corp. for use in its manufacturing process. Harper paid for the equipment with funds borrowed from Eastern Bank. Harper gave Eastern a security agreement and financing statement covering Harper’s existing and after-acquired equipment. On June 21, Harper was petitioned involuntarily into bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. A bankruptcy trustee was appointed. On June 23, Eastern filed the financing statement. Which of the parties will have a superior security interest in the equipment?
A. The trustee in bankruptcy, because the filing of the financing statement after the commencement of the bankruptcy case would be deemed a preferential transfer.
B. The trustee in bankruptcy, because the trustee became a lien creditor before Eastern perfected its security interest.
C. Eastern, because it had a perfected purchase money security interest without having to file a financing statement.
D. Eastern, because it perfected its security interest within the permissible time limits.
<u>Answer:</u>
Eastern parties will have a superior security interest in the equipment because it perfected its security interest within the permissible time limits.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Eastern has a higher security interest because Eastern amended its security interest inside the allowable time deadlines. A perfected security interest in any security interest in an asset that cannot be demanded by any other party.
Below the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), to perfect a security interest, a lender has 10 days from the date of the sale of material to perfect the security interest by filing a financing statement. Possessing registered in the 10-day limit, Eastern has a strong perfected security interest in the material and after-acquired things even though the bankruptcy was recorded two days ahead.
Answer:
The most probable result is that the court will declare the contract invalid and non-binding because the purchase price and important terms regarding the consideration involve are too vague and indefinite.
In order for a contract to be considered valid and binding, consideration must exist and the more precise the terms, the better. Consideration is something of value that both parties exchange. In this case it is a house vs. money, but the price is not specified.
Many activists and watchdogs argue that Google has not always done enough to promote or even protect human rights around the world. This is usually the result of efforts by Google to market its search engine in nations like China, where the state has an interest in maintaining censorship of search results. The project, known as Dragonfly, was recently abandoned by Google.
In recent years, Google was among the companies that faced criticism for marketing an app that allowed men in Saudi Arabia to track the locations of their wives by using their cell phones. This was seen as an affront to women's rights, and the company withdrew the product after criticism from the media and shareholders. Google's interest in artificial intelligence has also led to criticism about its commitment to ethical practices and to human rights.
At the same time, there is no doubt that Google has expanded people's access to information and to many other online services around the world. It has made several global public statements against censorship. Its most vocal critics, indeed, have pointed to its previous stands for free access to information in pointing out the hypocrisy of Dragonfly and other ventures.
