Answer:
The amount Laramie should record the purchase of land is <u>$6.2 million</u>.
Explanation:
The costs of a fixed asset refer to the purchase price and other relevant costs which are incurred in order to the location and working condition required to operate the fixed asset in way that it is intended.
The other relevant costs that are added to the purchase price to arrive at the cost of the fixed assets include professional fees, non-refundable taxes or levies, and among others.
If any trade discount or rebate is given, this will be deducted from the purchase price to arrive at the cost.
Any interest required to be paid on the delayed payment in order to reflects the time value of money are not part of the cost of the asset but expensed in the year they are incurred.
From the question, the land acquired is a fixed asset. Based on the explanation above, the total cost of the asset is $6.2 million. The interest from the 6% interest rate on the remaining $5 million will be part of the cost of the land but it will be expensed in the year they are incurred.
Therefore, the amount Laramie should record the purchase of land is <u>$6.2 million</u>.
Answer:
The future value of a 18-year annuity of $2,000 per period where payments come at the beginning of each period is $59,078.
Explanation:
We apply the formula to calculate future value of annuity to find the future value of 18-year annuity as at the beginning of year 18 ( because payment comes at the beginning of the year):
2,000/5% x (1.05^18 -1) = $56,264.77.
We further compound the future value of 18-year annuity as at the beginning of year 18 for one period to come up with the future value of this annuity as at the end of 18 year time:
56,264.77 x 1.05 = $59,078.
So, the answer is $59,078.
Answer:
Bette's Breakfast should increase the price or change the cost´s structure.
Explanation:
Bette's Breakfast should increase the price to get any profits because the total of the cost of serving that breakfast is higher than the price.
Profit= price* sales -((Variable cost * sales) +Fixed cost)
Other option is changing the structure of cost per meal.
When comparing Mexico to Scotland, you would expect Scottish workers to have greater productivity and higher labour cost per worker
Explanation:
One may expect that a Scotland plant will be less labour intensive and efficient per worker than just Mexican facilities as a more advanced technological nation and that "higher productivity and low labour cost" will be the right answer.
Both possibilities for lower productivity can be excluded as they demonstrate lower productivity. "Higher productivity, but less energy per job" is not the solution because it recognises lower labour costs per worker rather than higher.
The increase in labour productivity relies, according to certain studies, on three key factors: innovation and capital goods saving, modern technology and human capital.
