Answer:
The answer is Job perfomance= Motivation x Ability x Situational x Constraints
Explanation:
Because in this formula, job performance is how well someone performs the requirements of the job, motivation is the degree to which someone works hard to do the job well, ability is the degree to which workers possess the knowledge, skills, and talent to do the job well, and situational constraints are factors beyond the individual control of the empolyees. Such as policies, resources. Since job perfomance is a multiple function of motivation times ability times situational constraints, the job performance wil decline if one of those elements is considered insuficient.
Ignoring some safety regulations in order save $1 Million per day. The amount that those violations end up costing the company is $100 Billion.
<h3>What is safety regulation?</h3>
Safety regulation can be defined as a set of rules and regulation that an employees are mandated to follow so as to prevent work hazard.
Based on the given scenario ignoring the safety regulation so as to save $1 million per day will cost the company $100 Billion.
Which is why companies made it compulsory for employees to follow the saftey standard set so as to ensures that employees work in a safe and conducive environment .
Inconclusion the amount that those violations end up costing the company is $100 Billion.
Learn more about Safety regulation here:brainly.com/question/8430576
Answer:
correct answer is c. You both have the same amount of money
Explanation:
given data
invest = $1000
pay compound interest = 10%
pay simple interest = 10%
time = 1 year
solution
we get here difference in the total amount that is your friend money - your money .................1
so difference in the total amount = invest × 
- [ invest + ( invest × rate × time) ] ......................2
put here value
difference in the total amount = $1000 × 
- [$1000 + ( 1000 × 10% × 1) ]
difference in the total amount = 0
so correct answer is c. You both have the same amount of money
Answer:
waaaaassssssupppppppppppp
Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
If the SEC and the AICPA, worked altogether in order to share the information, they might have detected the fraud prior. The case states that the Madoff Securities does not required to submit the peer review program to AICPA as Friehling, had recorded that he did not perform or conduct any audits.
Recommendation
1. The policy execution for the exchange of the information among the two firms would be useful to detect the fraud.
2. The PCAOB should spend more resources an attending the hotline of whistle blowing through executing the policies which need certain complaints to be addressed effectively.
3. The firms or company should have done more in order to verify the financial statements assertions, which surrounds the investments. The PCAOB need to execute the policy that require the companies (such as Madoff Securities) to correctly answer the inquiries of the auditor.
