Cause it was bigger than the rest and it could plant more tobacco more than the rest
To me, as a third-year law student, the correct approach is "living document."
The number one reason for this is that the Constitution was written in the late 1700s. The framers could not have envisioned, let alone written, a document that considered a world with the internet, access to space, etc.
So, our choices are either to have a new Constitutional convention OR adapt the current document.
I choose the latter.
