1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoray [572]
3 years ago
13

What is the main reason Britain's claim to all lands between Newfoundland and Florida failed?

History
2 answers:
snow_lady [41]3 years ago
8 0
It kept trying to claim lands fall apart from each other. This causes isolation and leaves these lands weak.
Mice21 [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer - " Britain had too few settlements to enforce that claim. "

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP 15 PTS !!!! Has globalization's benefits outweighed its negative impacts on global society? Why or why not?
krok68 [10]

Answer:

Not completely, looking into it it says that globalization has not been good for working people. its hasn't really benefited everyone, so it really depends on how you see it.

Explanation:

I hope this help :)

8 0
2 years ago
Write a short paragraph that explains how the people of the Indus River Valley relied on and used the Indus to help create their
STALIN [3.7K]
The Indus river was a constant flow of natural resources. The river also made the soil very fertile and that meant good crops when planted in the right season, it also made it easy for trade boats to pass through.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which line from the text best reflects Cesar Chavez’s purpose? “The men who rule this country today never learned the lessons of
navik [9.2K]

Answer: B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the best explanation that describes the south’s strategy when the civil war began?
Darya [45]

The strategy of the Civil War for the Confederacy (the South) was to outlast the political will of the United States (the North) to continue the fighting the war by demonstrating that the war would be long and costly.
8 0
3 years ago
For either Mapp v. Ohio or Miranda v. Arizona, describe the constitutional issue of the case, and explain how the court's ruling
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.

A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The greatest factor in the development of "skyscrapers" was
    13·2 answers
  • 1. The Roman Catholic Church and northern Europe were united under Otto I.
    12·1 answer
  • The Fourth Amendment implies privacy because it protects the right
    6·1 answer
  • Austronesians brought human settlement to islands of the Pacific Ocean.<br> O True<br> O False
    14·1 answer
  • Women were not able to do what? Brainist
    15·2 answers
  • What was the War of 1812​
    11·1 answer
  • I left these shores, at Vancouver, a red-hot imperialist. I wanted the American eagle to go screaming into the Pacific. It seeme
    9·2 answers
  • In ancient civilizations, dances were performed as rituals for the government.
    14·2 answers
  • Help me :(
    11·1 answer
  • What was the intended effect of the proclamation of 1763?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!