1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
QveST [7]
4 years ago
12

Solve a(x − b) − 2k = L for x.

Mathematics
1 answer:
erik [133]4 years ago
7 0
a(x-b) -2k = L \\ ax - ab - 2k = L \\ ax = L + ab + 2k \\ x =  \frac{L}{a} + b + 2  \frac{k}{a}
You might be interested in
An octagonal pyramid ... how many faces does it have, how many vertices and how many edges? A triangular prism ... how many face
nadezda [96]

1: 8 faces and 9 with the base 9 vertices and 16 edges

2: 3 faces and 5 with the bases 6 vertices and 9 edges

3: 3 faces and 4 with the base 4 vertices and 6 edges

Hope this can help you.

4 0
4 years ago
Pls help, for 10 points!
Masteriza [31]

Answer:

I think 9 but dont quote me on it

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. You can buy six cans of root beer for $2.50. How many cans of root beer
zmey [24]

Answer

24 cans

Step by Step explanation

10$ / 2.5$ = 4

6 * 4  = 24

6 0
3 years ago
What is the slope of the line that passes through (3,-7) and (-1,1)
mafiozo [28]

the slope would be the change in Y over the change in X,

-7-1= -8, 3-(-1)= 4, -8/4 or -2 is the slope

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n > 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Joani has some stuffed animals. She has 2 times as many as Lily. Lily has 6 stuffed animals. Joanie gave 2 away and bought 4 mor
    10·2 answers
  • How much cellular data does Brainly.com use?
    14·1 answer
  • How can you add eight 8's to get the number 1,000? (only use addition) and how did you get this answer
    8·1 answer
  • 8.1 + 2.53<br><br><br> help<br> help
    6·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP! 15 POINTS Order the expressions from greatest to least coefficient of x. Place the expression with the greatest coe
    9·1 answer
  • Solve the equation- 5y -9 = -(y - 1)
    7·2 answers
  • ANSWER ASAP IS DUE IN 20 MINUITES (MIDDLE SCHOOL) (PROBABILITY)
    11·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE NO LINKS I WILL GIVE BRAINLY. ALL QUESTIONS PLEASE ​
    5·2 answers
  • explain how it is possible that all proportional relationships are linear functions but not all linear functions are proportiona
    14·1 answer
  • Please help me wonderful people! its math!!
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!