The claim should be sent through the process of latter making. The answer goes with the wuestion
Answer: B
Explanation:
Would be last, wouldn’t they? That would make the most sense to me.
Answer:
Bioarchaeology is a discipline that studies human skeletal remains in an archaeological investigation; while forensic anthropology refers to the study of human skeletal remains in a criminal case
Explanation:
Bioarchaeology is a discipline centered on the study of skeletal remains in order to obtain useful information about past societies/civilizations such as, for example, health conditions. On the other hand, forensic anthropology investigates human skeletal remains within a legal and/or criminal investigation. This information may result useful to identify a dead person, find the cause of death, and estimate time since death.
Similarities:
-Both disciplines have a strong biology background (especially in zoology)
-Both disciplines are focused on skeletal analysis
Differences:
-Bioarchaeology is associated with the anthropological study of human societies, while forensic anthropology associated with legal investigations
Answer:
<u>Origin:</u> In biology, origin can be described as the location where the muscle joins a stationary bone and as a result, no movement occurs.
<u>Insertion: </u>In anatomy, insertion can be described as the point of attachment which allows movement of a bone to occur. It moves when the muscles contract.
<u>Tendon:</u> In biology, the tendon can be described as a type of connective tissue which attaches a bone to a muscle.
<span>1.
</span>Cones perceive
light in color while rods perceive light in black and white.
<span>2.
</span>Rods can perceive dim light, unlike cones. The rods are located at the edges of the eyes. This is why it easier to perceive an image in the dark through
the corner of the eyes.
<span>3.
</span>The discs that compose the cones are usually
partially open to the surrounding vitreous
fluid while those of the rods are closed.
