1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murrr4er [49]
3 years ago
15

Asians tend to have lower infant mortality rates than other minority groups in the united states. this is most likely attributab

le to:
Social Studies
1 answer:
Nikitich [7]3 years ago
8 0
<span>The correct answer is "Socioeconomic status".

Socioeconomic Status id best described as a </span>financial<span> and sociological </span>combined total degree<span> of </span>someone<span>'s </span>paintings revel in<span> and of an </span>man or woman<span>'s or </span>family<span>'s </span>economic<span> and social </span>role in terms of<span> others, </span>primarily based<span> on </span>income<span>, </span>schooling<span>, and </span>profession<span>.</span>
You might be interested in
What type of volcanic material will the citizens be most concerned about
Lyrx [107]
It is either ash or lava.
5 0
3 years ago
Sesawang bina dialogue​
katovenus [111]

Sorry... didn't understand your question

3 0
3 years ago
Considering the potential impact on others prior to making a decision is consistent with ________ behavior. legal anti-social et
son4ous [18]
Considering the potential impact on others prior to making a decision is consistent with "ethical" behavior.
Ethical behavior refers to acting in courses predictable with what society and people normally believe are great qualities. Ethical behavior has a tendency to be useful for business and includes showing regard for key good rules that incorporate trustworthiness, reasonableness, correspondence, nobility, decent variety and individual rights.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain 5 major effects of Colonization on Africa.
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

Colonization did a number on Africa, but it wasn’t all bad (look at me trying to justify the actions of our tormentors). But joking aside colonization was responsible for one of humanity’s worst atrocities slavery... you know what, let me use a pros and cons list coz I just might end up rambling

"Cons"

Plundering of Africa’s natural resources. When European colonialists came to Africa, they came looking for raw materials for their industries (African countries started to be colonized right around the time the industrial revolution had taken root and spread all over Europe). There were also other economic and political reasons for invading Africa.

Slavery. When the colonialists came and found our great grandparents (yes it wasn’t that long ago), they found that we hadn’t developed to anything close their level. Africans were living in simple communities, we had just gone beyond hunters and gatherers and had begun adopting farming, animal keeping and participating in barter trade. We had what you would consider a rudimentary government and hierarchical leadership structures. And in terms of weaponry we had machetes, spears and shields made from dried animal hides. So when the Colonialists rolled up on our shores and saw this they thought, why trade while we can just point our guns at them and take whatever we want and kill whoever would try and stop us. Turns out it’s pretty easy to get someone to do your bidding after threatening to kill them and their whole community. So one after the other Africans were loaded onto ships, literally stockpiled to be used and sold.

Colonialists became vastly wealthy. I mean they were getting natural resources for next to nothing (okay the whips, chains, guns and boats big enough to carry as much stuff as possible weren’t free) and to top it all off free slave labour, then selling their products for a hefty profit. They were raking it in big at our expense.

Erosion of our culture. Communities were split up and others erased from existence all together. During the scramble and partition of Africa, colonialists paid no mind to the people that lived there. Clans were destroyed, communities split up and missionaries had us abandon practices that they considered backward. Communities that resisted, in some instances, had their entire villages burnt down. In West Africa, however, the French adopted the indirect method of rule, which involved assimilating Africans. This meant abandoning their language, beliefs, culture and adopting the ways of the French, but this seemed better than the alternative.

Africans were displaced from their land and concentrated into small settlements. This led to terrible living conditions and spread of diseases. White colonialist settlers accumulated huge tracts of land which after independence resulted to one of the worst land inequalities in the world, and lets not forget about apartheid.

We were dragged into a war that didn’t concern us. Hundreds of thousands of Africans were asked to “volunteer” to fight in WW2 and those that didn’t “volunteer” were forced to fight, as if they had a choice.

They forever altered our course of development. Europeans had the opportunity to go through the agrarian revolution then the industrial revolution and then proceed into the modern age. Some African communities were just beginning their agrarian revolution; we had started keeping animals, and adopted farming. We had even just started transitioning from barter trade to using our simple currencies (shells, beads, gold). I mean this was a burgeoning economy in its infancy when the Europeans decided to mess all that up.

Neo-colonialism. After colonization, the Europeans could no longer take whatever they wanted, we could now trade with Europeans. However there was a catch, we could only trade with our colonial masters. This eliminated competition (so how much you wanna bet we were getting a raw deal?). Another stipulation was that, we could only export raw materials thereby inhibiting the rate at which our local African industries could develop. Furthermore, there was to be preferential treatment to the colonialist settlers who chose to remain in the former colonies, from tax exemptions to allowing them to keep the huge tracts of land they had acquired for themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
Please help I honestly don't know how to do this..
Blizzard [7]

Answer:

Depends on how long it has to be.

Explanation:

you start with something that can attract the reader's attention like a fun fact. Then you describe your points of the negative effects of living in poverty like: health issues, maybe education, a place to stay, stress, mental health issues... Once you make short sentences about your "negative effects" conclude to pass the the next paragraphs where you go more in depth with the ideas. You can either look up one of the examples I gave and connect it to poverty or google the negative effects and then try and relate it and say it with your own words.

Hope I could help and didn't make it more complicated

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did annual Islamic pilgrimages help commerce and technology within the Islamic world?
    10·1 answer
  • In conclusion, why do objects on Earth appear to fall at different rates?
    7·1 answer
  • Write the importance of agriculture in Indian economy​
    12·2 answers
  • In the article "how (un) ethical are you" by banji, bazerman and clugh the authors discuss four related sources of unintentional
    7·1 answer
  • Which amendment said that states couldn't prevent people from voting based on race?
    11·1 answer
  • Mental disorders are generally thought of as persistent abnormal functioning.
    8·2 answers
  • how did Adam Smith believe individuals would help their home countries economies without government regulation
    8·1 answer
  • What is one way hinduism spread?
    13·2 answers
  • which cause and effect diagram best illustrates one main effect of informed citizens on the political system
    14·1 answer
  • What letter would you travel to hunt for survivors?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!