Answer:
90
Step-by-step explanation:
Its 630/7
(x+4)²= (x+4)×(x+4)
Use the FOIL method to simplify
F=First (multiply the first number of each expression)
O=Outside (multiply the outside edges of each expression)
I= Inside (multiply the inside edges of each expression)
L= Last (multiply the last number of each expression)
x times x= x²
x times 4= 4x
4 times x= 4x
4 times 4= 16
Add them together, we have: x²+4x+4x+16
We can simplify this by adding like terms
4x+4x=8x
Final expression= x² + 8x + 16
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
Angles 1,7 and 2,8 are alternate exterior angle.
