Answer: Agenda setting
Explanation:
Agenda setting is defined as subject or issue that is put up as agenda among the people which is impacted by a person's belief.Discussion on that particular issue is done by people to display their thoughts and perception on that agenda.
Agenda can be set by political groups, media, news etc.It helps the audience understand the importance of subject as it has been put up as agenda.According to the question, President is giving importance to the subject of health care by setting it as agenda among audience and ignoring the issue of marginal groups.
Answer:
the invasion of the gutians and climatic conditions
Explanation:
The empire collapsed after the invasion of the Gutians. Changing climatic conditions also contributed to internal rivalries and fragmentation, and the empire eventually split into the Assyrian Empire in the north and the Babylonian empire in the south.
Answer:
Option 3: easy, difficult and slow to warm up
Explanation:
The new york longitudinal study began in 1956. In it temperament study, it was found out that 40 percent of children exhibit an easy temperamental pattern
Temperament can simply be defined as a biological rooted behavioral ability that is found out earlyto be in life and are stable across various kinds of situations.
In Easy temperament by NYLS, it is characteristized by an individual having a positive mood, moderate to low intensity of reaction and they do have new approach to situations easily.
In difficult temperament: Individuals in this group are Known to have negative mood, irregular, slow to adapt, withdrew from new situa.
In slow to warm up temperament, individuals o f this group are known to have an slow to adapt, negative in mood, they do withhold from new situations and reacted with low to moderate intensity.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
