Answer:
This allowed the chiefs to not meet and form alliances against him. Meanwhile, he continued to invade the desired territories.
Explanation:
by separating the properties of the Chiefs, Kamehameha prevented them from uniting, forming alliances and managing to prevent him from achieving his goals. This was an insightful strategy, which managed in an exemplary way to reduce the risks of defeat for Kamehameha, in addition to stimulating his advance within the desired territories.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with a small group of people holding all of the control over a country, since this is slightly different than an "aristocracy". </span></span>
I have not because you have to be strong in what you believe in you can’t let somebody else sway the way YOU think about whatever it is you think about
<span>-Emperor Leo III & Roman Church clashed b/c of iconoclastic controversy> E & W church' relationship=strained
-Roman pope vs Patriarch of Constantinople disagreed about supreme leader & doctrine> Byzantine emperor gave no military protection to pope when attacked by Lombards</span>