Answer:
The three primary sources of authority that tax professionals should check against the citator before relying on those sources for important matters are;
1. Revenue procedures
2. Revenue rulings
3. Judicial decisions
Explanation:
A citator can be defined as an index of legal resources that allows the researcher to find newer documents of the original document and thus the history of statues and cases can be reconstructed. This has been collectively termed as shepardizing. There are different kinds of citators depending on the type of case one is handling. In our case, we are dealing with tax professionals. Tax professionals deal with three primary sources of authority that tax professionals should check against the citator before relying on those sources for important matters. These primary sources are; revenue procedures, revenue rulings and judicial decisions. They are further elaborated below;
1. Revenue procedures
A revenue procedure is a set of guide that give direction on how to apply law, regulations and rulings. They majorly give direction on matters involving tax.
2. Revenue rulings
A revenue ruling is an order directly from the Internal Revenue Services (IRS) that has the full backing of the law and therefor enforceable. Such rulings on revenue, give direction on how the IRS understands the tax laws. Since the IRS is an authority constituted by top-level tax professionals, a revenue ruling can be used by other tax professionals to cite cases of similar nature.
3. Judicial decisions
Judicial decisions is a statement of advice written by a judge or a panel of judges that serves as a guide in solving a legal dispute. They involve a written legal opinion that tends to justify how and why they arrived to that conclusion to solve the dispute. The same thinking can be used by other professionals in other disputes of a similar nature to solve them.
It will decrease
because the marginal productivities of workers will decrease. Diminishing marginal product occurs when the
marginal product of an input goes down as the quantity of the input goes up. The transformation in product resulting from
employing one more unit of a particular input for instance, the change in
output when a firm's labor is mark up from five to six units, assuming that the
mass of other product are kept constant is
called The input of marginal product or marginal physical product.
Answer:
lack of consumer safety
Explanation:
One of the biggest unethical practices that occur during the innovation process is lack of consumer safety. The entire idea of the innovation process is to try and create something truly functional that has not been done before and release it way before any competitor can create a similar product. In this rush to create the product, producers completely ignore many obvious faults that the product may have and/or any dangers it may pose to the consumer as long as the product works as intended.
Being involved in extracurricular activities can help you stand out on your college applications because it shows that you are skilled in more than 1 thing. Depending on the extracurricular you’re taking, you could be very good at strategic and critical thinking. This could be helpful in your future. Colleges do what the best of the best. Being involved in extracurricular activities also can show that you can take on more than 1 task. A lot of people can’t multitask or have a short attention span. This could be really good.
2. If I could create my own club or organization it would be one that explores individuals talents. Not a lot of people are sure what they want to be when they get older and I’d like to help them with that. Not any skills to be exact. The requirements would be to be serious about this, having manners, self-control, bring able to know what to respond to and what not, getting help instead of taking things into their own hands, and good listening.
3. Yes. You could use my first response as the answer to this question. There’s too many reason why getting into extracurricular activities is beneficial to getting the career of your dreams.9
The way economists would probably explain the wastage of
this clam resource is by saying that clams are free goods and are therefore
subject to the tragedy of the commons effect. The tragedy of the commons effect
is a theory in economics, postulated by the Victorian economist William Forster
Lloyd.
The tragedy of the commons effect describes a condition
within a shared-resource system where each user act freely according to their
own self-interest, but their collective actions ends in the depletion or spoilage
of that resource, thus having a negative impact on the common good of all users.
In this case, commons is taken to refer to the clam resources.
