The lands' end will be considered as the consumer in the given choices because a consumer is someone who purchases or buy materials for their benefits, this is seen above as they purchase merchandise and materials from around the world.
There is not enough information in this question to answer it. You cannot determine significance with just the alpha value. You need the actual test statistic (p-value) to determine this.
If the p-value is less than the alpha value, you reject the null hypothesis (the there is no difference).
Answer: 1. 18 times
2. Park is in better position
Explanation:
1. Times interest earned is a financial ratio that measures interest coverage. It's essentially to check if a company can pay it's debt payments and is calculated by either EBIT or EBITDA divided by the total interest expense. The higher the better and anything above 2.5 times is usually considered.
Calculating would therefore be,
= $6,120,000 /$340,000
= 18 times.
2. As mentioned in the first answer, for the Times interest earned, the higher it is, the more favourable it is. So Park Company will be considered safer and are most definitely in a better or worse position than its competitor to make interest payments if the economy turns bad. The fact that theirs is 18 means that they can pay off their interest expense 5 times more than their competitor who can only repay 12 times.
If you need any clarification do comment.
Answer:
Change in Assets is $127,500
Explanation:
The accounting equation for a corporation is:
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' Equity
⇒ Liabilities = Assets - Stockholders' Equity
= $285,000 - $130,500
= $154,500
At the end of years,
- Liabilities amount = Liabilities in the beginning + Change in liabilities = $154,500+ $90,000 = $244,500
- Stockholder's equity amount = Stockholder's equity + Change in stockholder's equity = $130,500 + $37,500 = $168,000
The assets at the end of year = $168,000 + $244,500 = $412,500
Change in Assets = $412,500 - $285,000 = $127,500
Shorter answer:
Change in Assets = Change in Liabilities + Change in Stockholders' Equity
= $90,000 + $37,500 = $127,500
in this case, identical changes in autonomous consumption and autonomous government spending: <span> have different effects on equilibrium income
When a factor is implemented and have two different reaction, it is safe to assume that that factor have two different effects.
For example, an increasing interest in technology(autonomous consumption) may increased the investment for tech products. The government spending may not give as much influence in this context because it wont affect the transaction between the customers and the producer
</span>
