Answer:tortious interference
Explanation:
tortious interference is a law term that comes to mind when there is a breach of contract resulting from the competitor's actions. Tortious interference in Tort law(an area of law) deals with the situation in which there is damage to property emanating from intentional or negligent acts of the defendant, in this case the competitor in business. In which case the actions(competitive behaviour) of defendant is not justifiable and permissible and simultaneously breaches contract of plaintiff, it becomes tortious interference.
Answer: $57,000,000
Explanation:
The employees purchased at a 20% discount which means that this 20% discount is the amount that would have to be covered by the company's pretax earnings:
= 19,000,000 * 15 * 0.2
= $57,000,000
<em>Martin's pretax earnings will be reduced by $57 million because the company would have to cover the discount on the shares. </em>
no then you would get in trouble, but then again it would be nice for you to do it fir him. tell the boss that he needed to go do something if he gets cureas.(can't spell)
Answer:
$57,925
Explanation:
n = 8 years
i/r = 6.5%/year
PV = $35,000
The amount in 10 years (FV) = 35,000 x (1+0.065)^8 = $57,925
Hawk corporation can not stop Hawk's use of Hawk because the motorcycles can not be confused with medicines and it will cause any monetary damage.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Trademarks possibly apply if the basic name creates turmoil in the brain of the customer. Since bikes can't be mistaken for clinical gear, the bike producer won't have the option to persuade an appointed authority that there are money related harms.
Subsequently, any endeavor to recuperate harms from the clinical stock organization will be a complete exercise in futility because the other trade mark is used by a firm making medicine which has no link with motorcycles.
