Answer:
<h2><em>The percent decrease is approximately 40%. </em></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one:
given data
initial count of fish= 850
final count of fish= 500
Required
% decrease
Step two:
% decrease= final-initial/initial*100
substitute
% decrease= 850-500/850*100
% decrease=350/850*100
% decrease= 0.41*100
% decrease= 40.1%
<em>The percent decrease is approximately 40%. </em>
<span>Income earned over one year is principal * int rate so we have
0.12*A + 0.13*B +0.14*C = 400
and A + B + C = 3000
and A+B = C</span>
Answer:
i think its rational.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the stemplot, it can be taken that:
Both were very consistent home run hitters, due to the great amount of seasons with at least 20 home runs. Bonds had the biggest outlier, with a season of 73 home runs, while Aaron distribution was less spread.
-------------------------------
- From the stemplot, it can be taken that Bonds had the biggest outlier, which was the season with 73 home runs.
- His season with the lowest amount of home runs was also less than Aaron, as he had a 5 home run season while Aaron lowest amount was 10.
- They both had a lot of seasons with at least 20 home runs, so both very consistent.
Thus, we can take that:
Both were very consistent home run hitters, due to the great amount of seasons with at least 20 home runs. Bonds had the biggest outlier, with a season of 73 home runs, while Aaron distribution was less spread.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24341344