Answer:
a generation gap
Explanation:
Generation gap refers to the difference between the values, thoughts, aspirations, actions, taste, etc between the people of two different generations. While the generation gap has been there throughout history, it widens in the twentieth century onward because of the changing institutions of the society. It is commonly referred to as the gap between parents and their off-springs.
All of these religions originated in different parts of the world.
Buddhism was cultivated in India by a young prince named Siddhartha Gautama (later known as Buddha, or the Enlightened One), who was dissatisfied with his luxurious life as long as he knew that there were people outside of his world that were living in misery.
Confucianism was founded by Confucius, an ancient Chinese scholar who promoted living selflessly and following the Golden Rule.
Islam is a religion that began in present-day Saudi Arabia by a young man named Muhammad, who claimed he had a vision from the angel Gabriel while resting in a cave.
Shinto is a Japanese religion that emphasizes respect for persons and certain structures known as shrines as well as other symbolic rituals and practices.
Of these religions, only D. Shinto was originated in Japan, so that is yoru correct answer.
Hope that helped! =)
The difference between a good deductive argument and a good non deductive argument is that of nature of premises.
The premises in deductive arguments guarantee the validity of the conclusion. On the other hand, the premises of non-deductive arguments do not imply that the conclusion is true. An argument that uses deductive reasoning presents premises—statements that are presumptively true or known to be true—for a conclusion that logically derives from those premises. Deductive arguments makes assumptions about what is already known in order to deduce truths about related conclusions. Which is not true in the case of non- deductive arguments. An argument that uses its premises to provide likely, but not definitive, support for its conclusions is known as a non-deductive argument.
To know more about deductive arguments, click here:
brainly.com/question/13004858
#SPJ4
Answer:
the new laws failed because there not as strict as they used to be
When we sit upright in the driver's seat, our ability to see the driving environment is maximised.
It helps us to direct our attention 20-30 seconds ahead of our vehicle as well to the both sides of the vehicle, we are able to identify the objects and conditions that could increase the level of risk.
When driving, we control the vehicle through brakes, steering wheel and accelerator. The vehicle's operating space is in front, the space behind or the space to the sides.
The vehicular acceleration produces a weight shift from front to rear. When the vehicle is stopped or travels at a constant speed the suspension load is stable.
To know more about driving here:
brainly.com/question/14332039
#SPJ4