1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
3 years ago
9

one way in which the kentucky and virginia resolutions and the south carolina ordinance of nullification are similar is that eac

h
History
1 answer:
max2010maxim [7]3 years ago
6 0

One way in which the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions and the South Carolina ordinance of nullification are similar is that each <u>claimed that laws passed by the Congress and signed by the President at that time were unconstitutional. </u>

In the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions (1798 and 1799 respectively) the states legislatures argued that the federal Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional. The act consisted of four laws that made it harder for an immigrant to become a citizen, allowed the president to imprison and deport non-citizens who were deemed dangerous or who were from a hostile nation and criminalized making false statements that were critical of the federal government.

The Ordinance of Nullification was passed by the South Carolina legislature declaring that the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional, and thereby null and void. The state held that the tariff imposed were detrimental to its well being and favored the North over the South.

You might be interested in
Buying, selling, or bartering of goods is called _____. trade ritual collecting
rodikova [14]

Answer: barter

Explanation:

In trade, barter (derived from baretor) is a system of exchange where participants in a transaction directly exchange goods or services for other goods or services without using a medium of exchange, such as money.

7 0
3 years ago
Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
iren [92.7K]
1. Congress leadership: Nehru and Gandhi underestimated Jinnah, Muslim League, its ambitions and outreach. In the 1920s, Gandhi neglected Jinnah and appealed to Muslims for a common cause, which seemed harmless at that time.In the 1930s, Nehru, assured of the backing of his socialist ideology and the support among the Muslim bases for the same, arrogantly believed that Muslims won't be moved by a party based on faith. It later turned out he was false.In the 1930s, Jinnah was willing to negotiate an agreement with the leadership, but was constantly ignored. This is going over my head. Arrogance and underestimation of someone doesn't go unpunished. However blame is to be equally shared by all the top leaders. In the 1940s, ML with almost a million members had no compulsion to bow out. He had no reason to cut a deal now. He was demanding recklessly. He refused to allow first independence , then partition. I may not comment on the course of history had this been allowed.While Gandhi tried his best possible to stop the painful separation, Nehru wasn't ready to the idea of Jinnah being the first Prime Minister of the independent India till the very end. Patel hoped partition would show Jinnah the fault in his ideas and would seal his fate. Thus the failure of Congress leadership and the rise of Jinnah is interlinked.
2. Jinnah and the Muslim League: He instigated religious passions and fears among the masses since the 30s.He was more concerned with the fact that Muslims and Hindus didn't intermarry or interdine and that Congress didn't have Muslim representatives in the 1946 Provincial Elections. He claimed in his 1940 Muslim League Presidential Address that cultures, literature and way of living and views on life were different of the two communities. The theory of one nation had been carried along too far and that it was nothing but a far fetched dream. I don't think partition gave too much peace either.The provinvcial elections were held on the lines of religion and demand for a new country, rather than on the promises of growth and "independence".Direct Action Day was a call by this great leader. What else do you expect from such a gathering at such a crucial point of time on such a critical issue. If countries could be made by gatherings and processions, I'm going out on the streets to demand the Shubham Kingdom! The violence, retaliation and counter violence led to the inevitable- Partition of two brothers, fighting for petty issues, not ready to listen and even the parents acting as stubborn kids.
4 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes this author's point of
salantis [7]

Answer:

C. Hitler was a charismatic leader who appealed to the German people.

Explanation:

Explanation? Just trust this dude

3 0
3 years ago
As commander of Texan troops at Fort Defiance (La Bahia), this man's poor leadership caused the Goliad Massacre?
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

Colonel James Fannin   -  D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the Mughal empire during the reign of emperor aurangzeb
azamat
The Empire gained territory but became more unstable
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • List two ways in which railroad affected people's everyday lives
    12·1 answer
  • How did Byzantine culture influence Europe?
    6·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from the Brazilian Constitution of 1988.
    8·2 answers
  • Who was considered Truman's biggest foe in the Election of 19487
    12·1 answer
  • How did the old ptolemaic view of the universe change during the scientific revolution?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which section of the Coastal Plains is located along the Rio Grande River? a. Piney Woods b. Post Oak Belt c. Blackland Prairie
    6·2 answers
  • How did Aryan culture explain the use of the caste system?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the site of human rights violations during the Iraq War?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the two main reason of resentment in Belgium in 1960????​
    13·1 answer
  • Natural resources of
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!