Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
He campaigned for the improvement of the circumstances of debtors in London prisons. For the purpose of providing a refuge for people who had become insolvent, and for oppressed Protestants on the continent, he proposed settlement of a colony in America.
This passage represents the founding of Georgia and the passage was from James Oglethorpe.
Umm I think D.) money in stocks have both high risk and high potential return.
Answer:
Goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
Explanation:
By establishing a comparison between the cultural directions that both law and psychology take, it is easier to figure out the reasons why, on some occasions, psychology and law have not been able to work together, whereas in some others, have been very productive in collaborating. These cultural differences take place because of their different goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
