I guess the answer is going to be how you look at the question. I believe the God of the universe, who was before time, created the universe. I believe the Bible when it says God created the heavens and the earth and down to the last blade of grass. Some people are very zealous about the creation being done is exactly 6, 24 hr. days. However, the Hebrew words aren't that specific and we really don't know what time was like back then. So, if the scientist want to say it took a million or two for the change to happen, I don't find any problem with that. I do not believe people evolved from some random rodent running around (theory after the monkey theory). God made us - not because he was lonely, or needed someone to manipulate or to feed some ego. God made us because he loved us and wanted us to enjoy his handiwork and to fulfill His plan. However, God did not make man a puppet but gave him free will to make choices. Our job is to help people see what the path to eternal life is, to help others and to show His love to others. With God, we are never alone but if you mean is there life on another planet. That may be one of the great mysteries of life we just don't know yet. Moral laws are not just guidelines you follow if you want to or not. They are laws from God and should govern one's life. God gives us brains to listen to others and discern what is meant. The Bible, God's Word to man, tells us many times we should help the more unfortunate, take care of widows and children, help those in hunger and need. However, the Bible also says those that do not work and are able to should not be given food. God expects the able-bodied people to work for a living and not sponge off of other people just because we are lazy.
Hope this helps you some.
The decision of this case is going to be done through the use of the strict liability tort.
<h3>What is the strict liability tort?</h3>
This is the tort that makes a person to be resonsible for all damages or loss that may have happened due to their actions. This is regardless of culpability.
Even though the use of the pesticides was not aimed at destroying the neighbors beehives, it did. Therefore, Mattingly's actions has caused damages for his neigbors. He has to pay for damages.
Read more on the strict reliability tort here: brainly.com/question/14927068
Answer:
Victimization surveys
The completeness of the information provided by the administrative records is questionable, mainly due to the so-called “dark number” of the crime, that is, all those crimes that are not reported to the authorities and consequently are not reflected in any statistics. The victimization surveys are born with the objective of overcoming the obstacle of the “dark figure”, to know the phenomenon of criminal victimization and perceptions of justice, studying a representative part of the population , from such that, from this representative group, conclusions are drawn on the total population with a known level of confidence.
Explanation:
Global context
The first victimization surveys were conducted in the 1960s-70s [5] and as they were adopted more widely throughout the world, they were likely to be used to carry out comparative studies on crime and victimization at the international level. However, comparisons were impossible due to the disparity of methodologies used between one country and another, such as: different questionnaires, sampling scheme, interview method, crime classification, etc.
One of the first efforts to improve comparability between surveys occurs in 1987 in Europe, with the development of the International Survey on Crime and Victimization (ENICRIV or ICVS), with a questionnaire in English that was later translated into different languages, standardizing as much as possible the methodology used for data collection . Initially surveyed in 14 countries, later with the participation of the United Nations Interregional Institute for Research on Crime and Justice (UNICRI ) and UNODC, the survey expanded to other countries, Europe from the east, Africa and Latin America
Answer:
Laissez Faire was an economic and political belief that government should not intervene in the working of the economy.
Explanation:
Laissez faire is derived from french. It was a dominant belief in the 19th century. The supporters of laissez faire believed that government should not intervene in the market. They advocated the idea that market forces can work in balance on their own.
It was a dominant believe in 1800s and early 1990s and was supported by physiocrats. Though with the increase in mass production, it became evident that laissez-faire is not a sufficient guiding principle for economy.
