1. The First Amendment: This is the freedom of speech, without the freedom of speech we could not share our ideas or even ask for simple things! This is a very important amendment.
2. The Fourth Amendment: This states they have no right to search your house without purpose. This is important because many of us have private things that are not illegal, but would not want to share.
3. The Tenth Amendment: The goverment only has powers listed in the constitution. If the goverment had to much power they would most likely raised taxes a lot and do things for there own gain. This would be a major issue in America.
Have a good day and I hope this helps! :-)
The answer is like the second choice, “Africa’s river systems made it easy for Europeans to reach the the African interior”. We can determine this is correct by cancelling out the other options.
1- yes, Africa WAS rich in natural resources, but the Europeans did not care much for that. They had come to Africa for trade and slaves.
3- similar to A, the Europeans weren’t there because they were running out of space, yes they did conquer and claim lands in Africa, but the purpose of them being there was goods.
4- a lot like C, but not very relevant at all, especially since at this time the Europeans who were traveling definitely did not farm, they wanted their goods already prepared.
Since the other options have been ruled out, I will explain 2 a little bit. Obviously, the Europeans had sailed to Africa. At first the remained on the edges of it, taking over ports and just sailing along picking up slaves and continuing west. A good example of an African river used by the Europeans is the Congo River. It branches out throughout all of Congo and it’s historical importance is that an explorer named Henry Morton Stanley used it to continue into Africa. Though he may not sound familiar, we’ve all heard the phrase “Doctor Livingstone, I presume”. It was Stanley who said this once meeting with him.
Answer I'll tell you later
Explanation:
.
<span>In 1862 and early 1863, both the Union Navy and Army tried and failed to capture Vicksburg.
Hope this was helpful!</span>
Rodney King case illuminate the differences between how black and white Americans saw the police and the justice system is explained.
<h3>What was Rodney King case?</h3>
The Rodney King case illustration, that the police profit from a double standard when defining illegal activity, which causes minorities to have a negative perception of the police.
Some key feature of this case are-
- As the Los Angeles riots that followed the acquittal of the white police officers accused of beating the black motorist showed, this cynicism can lead to civil unrest.
- Only the serious possibility of criminal prosecution will have an influence on police wrongdoing because civil lawsuits and civilian review boards have failed to stop police brutality.
- The existing situation, in which almost all prosecutors choose not to launch a meaningful challenge to widespread police brutality, may be improved with citizen access to a grand jury.
To know more about the challenges faced by minorities (African Americans) in U.S, here
brainly.com/question/4378535
#SPJ4
