Answer:
She did not consider the multiplicative inverse property of a real number
Step-by-step explanation:
Jacinta in her conclusion did not consider the Multiplicative Inverse property of real numbers.
Let x be an irrational number.
So, 
If x is an irrational number, then its reverse is also an irrational number. So by the Multiplicative Inverse property their product is 1 and 1 is a rational number. Thus, Jacinta was incorrect.
Answer:
(1, -3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Start where the axes meet. That is the origin (0,)
Move 1 place to the right that is the x coordinate
Move 3 places down that is the y coordinate
(1,-3)
Answer:
0.333333+
Step-by-step explanation:
So hmmm check the picture below
in an isosceles triangle, two sides are equal, and thus the angles those twin legs make, are also twin angles
let's say the angle made is "a", so all internal angles will be 64 + a + a = 180
or 64 + 2a = 180
thus 2a = 180 - 64 => 2a = 116, thus a = 116/2
