Answer:
1. d) There was a lack of evidence that the students ' actions disrupted learning.
2. c) Students have fewer privacy rights in school than in other public settings.
3. d) Brianna's 1st Amendment rights (freedom of speech) were violated, and her actions did not cause any disruptions to the day-to-day functioning of the school.
4. c) New Jersey v. T.L.O.
5. a) Bell's recording provided grounds for a substantial disruption and interference with normal school activities.
Explanation:
- The court ruled that the school administration's search of T.L.O.'s pocketbook in this instance did not violate the 4th Amendment. The fourth amendment applies to everyone in the school, including the administrators.
- On June 25, 2009, the Supreme Court upheld, reversed, and remanded. In a judgement made by the court in the 4th amendment case of New Jersey v. T. L. O., the Court decided that the search did not meet the "reasonable suspicion" requirement for searches of kids in a school context.
- Due to the policy's vagueness and potential for discriminatory application, the court found it illegal. The court also said that Brianna's 1st Amendment rights had been violated because her actions didn't change how the school normally ran.
Answer:
World War I developed into a global war for a number of reasons. First, the system of alliances quickly brought other nations into the war. This quickly led to a war between the two alliance systems. But Italy switched sides and entered the war on the side of the Triple Entente in 1915.
Explanation:
Loyalists (also labeled Tories) made up one third of the colonial population; they wished to remain British and felt that things were just right the way they currently were. The Patriots, however, were eager for independence and felt that freedom was what they needed. Different views caused fights among colonists, causing horrible events, such as the Civil War.
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. The central idea of this text is that the United States was justified in annexing Texas. The author supports this in his statement, "Imbecile and distracted, Mexico never can exert any real governmental authority over such a country." The writer here means that only the United States had the true rights to rule over Texas.
2. Yes, according to this document, the United States was right in going into war with Mexico. The speaker in the text strongly justifies the annexation of Texas by the United States because he believes that a country like Mexico lacked what it took to preside over Texas. He also believed that it was the manifest destiny of the United States approved by God for them to expand their territory to accommodate their growing population.
