Option A is the correct answer
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Explanation:
A reduction in spending is going to reduce the income of the consumers in the economy. The consumers do not spend all their income but save it partially. The saving is used to create funds which are invested again and lead to increase in output. The rate of consumption depends on the marginal propensity to consume and marginal propensity to save. The marginal propensity to save is 1-MPC. Smaller MPS will cause saving to be less, consequently investment will also be lower.
So, a reduction in the government spending will be more effective in curbing demand-pull inflation if the marginal propensity to consume is higher and marginal propensity to save is smaller.
Answer:
160,000 units
Explanation:
Step 1 : Determine the Sales Mix
Bramble : Standard
60000 : 40000
3 : 2
Step 2 : Determine the Overall Break even Point
Break even Point = Fixed Cost ÷ Contribution per unit
= $2400000 ÷ $30
= 80,000
Step 3 : Determine break-even point for Standards
Standards Break even point = 80,000 x 2
= 160,000 units
Thus,
Bramble Corp would sell 160,000 units of Standards at the break-even point
Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>
The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.
From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.
<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>
- Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
- The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
- "Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ4
Answer:
the amount charged on a job is $401.50
Explanation:
The computation of the amount charged on the job is shown below:
The Amount to be charged is
= Material Loading Charge + Labor Charge + Materials Cost
= 35% × $110 + $23 Per Hour × 11 Hours + $110
= $38.50 + $253 + $110
= $401.50
Hence, the amount charged on a job is $401.50
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
