Answer: Christina can hold Randy liable for the check
Explanation:
In this scenario it is important to note 2 things.
1. Nina PAID Randy.
2. Randy PAID Christina.
The point is that Randy is the one who had a contract with Nina. Even though Nina is the one who's check was not honored, Christina has NO CONTRACT with Nina. This means she cannot hold her liable.
As far as Christina is concerned, the check came from Randy and so she should hold him liable.
Randy on his part can then go back to Nina and hold her liable because he is the one who had a contract with her.
If you need any clarification do comment.
A person must frequently discover the complexity of his or her financial situation.
Answer:
a. retained earnings statement, as a $630,000 addition to the beginning balance
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Change in increase in inventory = $900,000
Income tax rate = 30%
By considering the above information, the cumulative effect is
= Change in increase in inventory - Change in increase in inventory × income tax rate
= $900,000 - $900,000 × 30%
= $900,000 - $270,000
= $630,000
This $630,000 is a addition to the beginning balance
Every day, Pepsi products are delivered to grocery stores, gas stations, vending machines, and restaurants in the united states and locations around the world. to accomplish this task, pepsi must have an expedient to get its products from its source to the consumer in the supply chain.
<h3>
What is Pepsi?</h3>
- PepsiCo produces the carbonated soft drink known as Pepsi.
- Caleb Bradham first invented and introduced Brad's Drink in 1893. In 1898, it was renamed Pepsi-Cola, and in 1961, the name was abbreviated to Pepsi.
- Caleb Bradham created Pepsi at his drugstore in New Bern, North Carolina, where it was first sold in 1893 under the name "Brad's Drink".
<h3>What stands for Pepsi?</h3>
- In 1893, Caleb Bradham created the first Pepsi beverage at his drugstore in New Bern, North Carolina, and sold it under the name "Brad's Drink."
- In 1898, the drink's name was changed to Pepsi Cola in honor of the recipe's inclusion of kola nuts and the digestive enzyme pepsin.
Learn more about Pepsi here:
brainly.com/question/13373374
#SPJ4
Under Price discrimination, an organization compares a few dimensions of its performance to that of another company, be it a competitor or in a totally distinctive industry.
Charge discrimination is a promoting method that fees clients one-of-a-kind charges for the same products or services based on what the seller thinks they can get the patron to comply with. In natural price discrimination, the vendor fees every customer the most fee they'll pay.
Charge discrimination refers to charging distinct clients special costs for the same true carrier. The Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, and Robinson-Patman Act outlaw price discrimination while the intent of that discrimination is to harm competitors.
Price discrimination in a monopoly is a practice of charging extraordinary costs for an equal product. Monopolies generally have extra control over providers than ordinary sellers, which means that they can notably impact the providers' promoting prices.
Learn more about Price discrimination here: brainly.com/question/23342760
#SPJ4