The answer is 14.4
Hope it Helps :]
The answer is I don’t really know how to explain it but trust me it’s B: 8.1
<span>A counterexample is an example which disproves a proposition.
Given that Evelia conjectured that <A and <B are acute angles. Since, <A is congruent to <B, a counterexample to the conjecture is two equal angles which are not acute angles.
</span><span>An acute angle is an angle smaller than a right angle (it is less than 90 degrees and more than 0 degrees).
Therefore, the statement that is a counterexample to Evelia's conjecture is </span><span><span>m∠A=126°</span> and <span>m∠B=126°</span></span>
RE is a line, so angles RPL and EPL form a linear pair and are supplementary.
Supplementary angles are two angles whose measures add up to 180 degrees.
3z + 2z = 180
5z = 180
z = 36
m<RPL = 3z = 3 * 36 = 108
m<EPL = 2z = 2 * 36 = 72
Answer: D. 108 and 72
Answer:
The value of Z = 0.3066... Or 0.31.
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula of direct proportional is a=kb (where k is constant). Given that a=z=0.2 and b=x=15, equation is 0.2=15k,
k=0.2/15
k=0.0133333333333
If x is 23 then what is z?
z=0.0133333333333(23)
z=0.3066666 or 0.31
