Explanation:
non-representative it's not based off of Constitution I think?
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
The Louisiana Purchase was a land deal between the United States and France, in which the U.S acquired approximately 827,000 square miles of land west of the Mississippi River for $15 Million.
Hope this helps.
"The mass of Substance C is five times the mass of Substance B", the given statement is correct.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
As Jessie added 16 gm. of Substance A to 4 gm. of Substance B Obtained certain amount of Substance C which can be calculated as follows:
amount of Substance C = Substance A + Substance B = 16 + 4 = 20 gm
Therefore, 20 gram of Substance C was obtained. Here, fourth statement is correct which says the mass of Substance C ifs five times the mass of Substance B to justify this, see the below:
True
Hope it helps!
Brainliest would be nice but you don’t have to :)
