Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
A. $287,000
B. $192,050
Explanation:
a. Based on the information givenwe were told that company ABC had net income of the amount of $287,000 after deducting Robert's salary of the amount of $86,100 which therefore means that ROBERT'S QUALIFIED BUSINESS INCOME will be the amount of $287,000.
b. Calculation to determine whether your answer to part (a) would change if you determined that reasonable compensation for someone with Robert's experience and responsibilities is $181,050
Based on the information given the amount of $192,050 will be the additional amount of salary that can be deducted which is Calculated as:
=[$287,000 - ($181,050-$86,100)]
=$287,000-$94,950
=$192,050
They must update company HR policies and procedures is An effect of changing legislation on human resources professionals.
<h3>What is
human resources?</h3>
Human resources is the recruiting department in the organization, that has many roles and responsibilities like payroll, fill the vacant position of the company, ensure the company's harmony, arranging the events in the organization.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about human resources, click here:
brainly.com/question/13190588
#SPJ1
Answer: $137,000
Explanation:
Contribution margin = Sales - Variable expenses
Sales (30 * 20,000) $600,000
Cost of Goods sold(24,000 + 340,000 - 19,000) ($345,000)
Variable selling expense (3.2 * 20,000) ($64,000)
Variable administrative expense (2.7 * 20,000) ($54,000)
Contribution margin $137,000
Cost of goods sold = Beginning merchandise + Purchases - Ending merchandise
