Individuals convicted of a felony are still eligible to vote unless they are convicted ... If convicted of only one felony, voting rights are automatically restored upon
Answer: The intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements
(1) The defendant must act intentionally or recklessly.
(2) The defendant's conduct must be extreme and outrageous:
(3) The defendants act is the cause of the distress
(4) Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct.
Explanation:
Intentional or reckless act: It is not necessary that an act be intentionally offensive. A reckless disregard for the likelihood of causing emotional distress is sufficient.
Extreme and outrageous conduct:
The conduct must be horrible and beyond the standards of civilized decency or utterly intolerable in a civilized society. Whether the conduct is illegal does not determine whether it meets this standard.
Cause of the distress: The actions of the defendant must have actually caused the plaintiff's emotional distress beyond the bounds of decency.
Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct: This standard is quantified by the intensity, duration, and any physical manifestations of the distress.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
This case ruled to be unconstitutional for state officials to create school prayer or recitations in public schools because it violated the establishment clause.
Answer:
I would like to see some aspect in the issue of abandoning children or pets.People abandon their children or pets because their either irresponsible,or doesn't want them anymore so they can do anything they want without having to hire a babysitter or pet-sitter.If they were going to throw them out,why did they adopt or have the baby?I feel bad for all the animals and children taht get thrown out or abandoned to live on their own.they probably dont know how to live on their own,and what if they accidently get killed when crossing the street,or what if the child gets kidnapped and something really bad happens to them.(dont have to insert this part) I was thrown out and CPS found me and my brothers and we were imediatly separated and put into foster homes around the world.Luckilly my parents found me nad helped me and my bros out.
Explanation:
