<span>modern-day United Kingdom (England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales)</span>
Answer:
d. are less likely to be influenced by a similarity in attitudes.
Explanation:
Childhood peer group and adolescent peer group are two distinct group in the life of every individual all over the world. During childhood, the peer group tends to have a great infulence leading to the determination of the group of activities done together. This could be music, dance, type of cloth worn or the frienship kept.
While in adolescent stage, the peer group tends to have minimal influence as a result of the individual trying to discover his or her purpose in life and trying to re-alinging his or life to a long term career goal. example is an adolescent that want to be a doctor would definetly prevent his peer group of friends leaning towards music to influence him to abandone his dreams and join the bandwagon which they all are in.
<em>He will prefer to minimize his relationship with the peer group while pursuing his dream career goals. </em>
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), is a United StatesSupreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. ... The Minor v. Happersett ruling<span> was based on an interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. I believe the answer is A.</span>
The stage in which both the adults and children in a stepfamily hold unrealistic expectations is called the 'fantasy' stage in Papernow's model.
It is common for both sides to bring their own ideas of what a stepfamily will be like into the relationship. Many of these ideas will later prove inaccurate.
Answer:
D. These statements are all valid.
Explanation:
The law of large numbers states that the approximation by relative frequency tends to improve as the number of observations increases. This law reflects a fairly simple notion supported by common sense: A probabilistic estimate based on only a few observations may differ greatly, but with a slight difference. Increasing number of observations the estimate tends to be increasingly smaller (precision). With this, we can conclude that it is correct to say that:
- If one looks at the proportion of times an event has occurred over a long period of time (or over a large number of trials), one can be more certain of the likelihood of its occurrence.
- The relative frequency approximations for an event tend to get better with more observations.
- The more times an experiment is repeated, the closer the relative frequency of an event tends to get to the actual probability of the event.
For example, if we do a survey of the population of a Brazilian state and look at only a few citizens (sample), the results may contain a big mistake, but if we analyze several people in several different cities within this state (randomly selected), the results of the samples will be very close to the true values of the population and the larger the sample (larger number of people interviewed) the greater this approximation will be.
