Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
Banks are where most of the people's money is stored so they have a lot of money which they can choose to invest. If the government chooses to change something it can effect the money that the people trusted in the bank.
Answer:
Governor Faubus resisted the school's integration with National Guard troops, and President Eisenhower sent federal troops to enforce integration.
Explanation:
Answer:
For: more money,power and to gain possession and control of military eauipment.
Against: too much power, or money, eveything could go wrong and lead to a war.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. the french is the correct answer.
Explanation:
