Prisoners on death marches were supplied with (A) nothing.
Prisoners were forced to march long distances without food or water. If they fell while walking, and could not keep up with the others, they were shot and killed. Given no food and water, some survived the marches by grabbing what they could find along the way, including grass, grubs and occasional potatoes found in the fields. Their treatment was horrid.
We usually see historiographical versions from the point of view of the winners. Who would be the conquered, would agree with this version of the facts? Justify your answer. *
