All categories

3 years ago

.2(2.50+4.95+6.00)

1 answer:

6 0

You multiply .2 by every number in the parentheses. So .2 times 2.50, which is 0.5, .2 times 4.95, which is .99 and .2 times by 6, which is 1.2. then you add .5, .99 and 1.2 to get 2.69.

You might be interested in

How do you know if an number composite or not

cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

A prime number has only two factors: 1 and itself. A composite number has more than two factors

Step-by-step explanation:

Can i have a thanks?

3 0

3 years ago

One week, Jason earned $404.70 at his job when he worked for 19 hours. If he is paid the same hourly wage, how many hours would

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

29 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

If he earned $404.70 per 19 hours, you do 404.70/19 to figure out the amount he earns per hour. 404.7/19 is 21.3. He earns $21.3 per hour. to solve, you find how many times 21.3 goes into 617.7 or 617.7/21.3. That is 29. He needs to work 29 hours to earn $617.70

7 0

3 years ago

Need help ASAP thank you

Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

x = 14

Step-by-step explanation:

First put it into slope intercept form

20 = 2x - 8

Move the variable to the left hand side and change its symbol

-2x + 20 = -8

Move the constant to the right hand side and change its symbol

-2x = -8 - 20

Calculate the difference

-2x = -28

Divide both sides of the equation by -2

x = 14

Solution

X = 14

8 0

2 years ago

You work in the HR department at a large franchise. you want to test whether you have set your employee monthly allowances corre

ra1l [238]

Answer:

1) Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 500$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu > 500$

$z=\frac{640-500}{\frac{150}{\sqrt{40}}}=5.90$

For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.01 of the area in the right and we got:

$z_{crit}= 2.33$

For this case we see that the calculated value is higher than the critical value

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enugh evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance level

2) Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>5.90)=1.82x10^{-9}$

If we compare the p value and the significance level given $\alpha=0.01$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, same conclusion for part 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Part 1

Data given

$\bar X=640$ represent the sample mean

$\sigma=150$ represent the population standard deviation

$n=40$ sample size

$\mu_o =500$ represent the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.01$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

Step1:State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean is higher than 500, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 500$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu > 500$

Step 2: Calculate the statistic

$z=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$z=\frac{640-500}{\frac{150}{\sqrt{40}}}=5.90$

Step 3: Calculate the critical value

For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.01 of the area in the right and we got:

$z_{crit}= 2.33$

Step 4: Compare the statistic with the critical value

For this case we see that the calculated value is higher than the critical value

Step 5: Decision

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enugh evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance level

Part 2

P-value

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(z>5.90)=1.82x10^{-9}$

If we compare the p value and the significance level given $\alpha=0.01$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, same conclusion for part 1

7 0

3 years ago

A large concrete mixing machine can mix a certain amount of concede in 12 hours, while a smallet one can mix

Andrews [41]

Answer:

[(1/12)(5/5) + (1/20)(3/3)](x hours) = 1

(5/60 + 3/60)x = 1

(8/60)x = 1 we can reduce 8/60 by dividing out a 4

(2/15)x = 1 x both sides by 15/2

x = 15/2

x = 7 1/2 or 7.5 hours

5 0

3 years ago