Answer:
the third option, x = –3, –1, 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
g inverse = (1,a),(2,b),(c,3),(4,d)
Step-by-step explanation:
I think the third part of the question should be (c,3) not (2,3)
if it's (2,3) then the inverse becomes (3,2)
<u>Answer:</u>
The height of the tower nearby the pole is 102 m.
<u>Solution:</u>
Given,
Height of the pole = 3.5 m
Length of the shadow of the pole = 1.47 m
Length of the shadow of the tower nearby = 42.75 m
Let us assume the height of the tower as x


On solving for x we get,


On rounding off to the nearest meter we get,
x=102 m
The height of the tower is 102 meter.
Answer:
could not be the same
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that approximately US drivers are agewise as follows:
<25 13.2
25-45 37.7%
>45 49.1%
Observations are made for a sample of 200 fatal accidents.
Let us create hypotheses as

(Two tailed chi square test at 5% significance level)
Age <25 25-45 >45
Expected 13.2 37.7 49.1 100
Observed 42 80 78 200
Expected no 26.4 75.4 98.2 200
Chi square 9.218181818 0.280636605 4.155193483 13.65401191
df = 2
p value = 0.001084
Since p <0.05 we reject null hypothesis
At the 0.05 level, the age distribution of drivers involved in fatal accidents within the state could not be the same as the age distribution of all US drivers as there seems to be significant difference.
To find the area you times length times width give you the area so 11 X 15 is 165cm squered