Answer:
Spanish american war
Explanation:
By the following year, Congress had authorized raising a unit of volunteer Soldiers in the newly acquired territory. Several thousand Hispanic volunteers, mostly from the southwestern United States, fought with distinction in the U.S. Army during the Spanish-American War.
<span>Through a granted power. Popular sovereignty is a doctrine rooted in the belief that every human being is sovereign, and rather than a monarch or single individual, that they could unite and each delegate a small portion of their sovereign powers and duties to those who wished to temporarily serve as officers and employees of a state, who would then serve the rest of the people according to the will of the people expressed via a constitution and democratic process.
That the people fought for equality with the King of England was enshrined in their Declaration of Independence and was a matter of common knowledge in America after the Revolution. The first Chief Justice, John Jay, published this in his Opinion in the first major supreme Court case in order to briefly illustrate what was ordained and established and would eventually come to be known by the American usage of the term "popular sovereignty":
It will be sufficient to observe briefly that the sovereignties in Europe, and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the Prince as the sovereign, and the people as his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance, and excludes the idea of his being on an equal footing with a subject, either in a court of justice or elsewhere... No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects, and have none to govern but themselves</span>
Answers:
HOPE THIS HELPS!! GOOD LUCK!! I TRIED MY BEST!!
1. His voyages marked the Exchange's beginning
2. From both east to west and west to east
3. They all made countries of the Old World richer
4. Missionaries protected individuals, often at the cost of the native culture
5. smallpox
6. Immunity from smallpox and the flu because the native Americans tried to gain immunity from diseases such as smallpox, the flu and such.
7. African slaves were needed to work on sugarcane plantations
8. Corn
9. North America
10. Spanish is the main spoken language many South American countries
Answer:
Explanation:
The Constitution grants the Federal Government its rights.
Somehow I have to get rid of 3 words. The 10th Amendment is much more complex than what I've written.
I hope you don't mean the 10th Commandment which is (in 4 words) Thou Shalt not Covet. It really says Thou Shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife.
The rights of the Feds is 10. That cuts it by 1.
Fed rights are in 10. That did it. But you really should read it. The 10th is meant to balance the power between the states and the Federal Government, something that worried the founding fathers quite a bit.
Colonialism in Latin America really did not have much of an impact, as the original natives were either exterminated outright( the Mayas,Incans, Aztecs) or retreated into remote areas( native Indian tribes), so the population that came later were mostly of European or mixed European-Indian ancestry origin. Also the region became independent earlier than Asia or Africa, most of the nations breaking away from Spanish/Portugese rule. But even after independence most of the Latin American nations, still suffered from another kind of colonialism, economic.Corrupt,dictatorial rulers, crony businessmen, the armed forces, created a ruling elite, which saw the rich benefiting, while most of the ordinary people remained dirt poor as ever. Add to it most of the Latin American nations depending on a single crop(Coffee/Sugar in Brazil) or mineral( Silver in Argentina), their economies often took a hit, due to market factors.
Countries in Asia, Africa began to throw off the colonial yoke post World War II. There was a difference, in Asia, the colonial powers created territories on basis of economic consideration. So you had larger nations with more diverse populations, esp places like India, Indonesia, Malaysia. So it was possible for Hindus,Muslims,SIkhs to co exist in India inspite of the bitter experiences of Partition here or Malays,Chinese, Indians existing in Malaysia together. In Africa however, colonial powers however redrew boundaries based on tribal divisions, and played off one tribe against other. Case in point Rwanda, where the Belgian colonial power, deliberately favored the Tutsis over the Hutus, with disastrous results later on.
Also I feel European colonialism was much worse in Africa, than in Asia. It had to do with the way they looked at the natives. While Europeans had no love lost for the "uncivilized natives" of Asia, there was a significant section that felt Asia had a lot of contribute in terms of philosophy and culture. Many European scholars, translated ancient Arabic, Sanskrit,Persian scriptures and texts, and that showcased a region, which had a rich culture and history. While Asia was seen as a backward nation, the Asians were generally seen as "intelligent,cultured" people who could be civilized( read Westernized). On the other hand Africans were seen as a barbaric, uncivilized species, who needed to be dealt with in the harshest manner( read most brutal). British took the trouble of introducing railways, Parliamentary system of Governance to India, they did not even bother building such things in their African territories. The French were even worse, they just used their colonies as raw material resource pits, it's not surprising that most of Sub Saharan Africa was under French rule. Africa really did not have the institutions to build on, unlike nations in Asia, when most of the countries became independent. I hope it helped!!!
