D. Because it corresponds to the angle to the left
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
simplify
to
then
-0.05 × 120 = -6
then we have our answer
-6√2
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer:
-1
Step-by-step explanation:
-4(-1)-5=4-5=-1
The answer is 10. I hope that this helped ☻
