Answer:I am pretty sure it is B obv that is the only one that makes enough sense (x+3.50)x65 (x)41 and the only one that makes sense to me is B!
Step-by-step explanation:
1,076 (the original thickness) - 22.7 meters (loss per year) * 7 (lost 22.7 meters per year for seven years, so multiply the loss per year by the amount of years) = 917.1 (the size after 7 years)
A.K.A 1,076 - 22.7 * 7 = 917.1
https://www.tiger-algebra.com/drill/3%7Cx-1%7C%3E=12/
Sources tiger algebra.com
Answer:
use logarithms
Step-by-step explanation:
Taking the logarithm of an expression with a variable in the exponent makes the exponent become a coefficient of the logarithm of the base.
__
You will note that this approach works well enough for ...
a^(x+3) = b^(x-6) . . . . . . . . . . . variables in the exponents
(x+3)log(a) = (x-6)log(b) . . . . . a linear equation after taking logs
but doesn't do anything to help you solve ...
x +3 = b^(x -6)
There is no algebraic way to solve equations that are a mix of polynomial and exponential functions.
__
Some functions have been defined to help in certain situations. For example, the "product log" function (or its inverse) can be used to solve a certain class of equations with variables in the exponent. However, these functions and their use are not normally studied in algebra courses.
In any event, I find a graphing calculator to be an extremely useful tool for solving exponential equations.
Step-by-step explanation:
