The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Food rations affect people’s perception of their government because the rations are granted in different parts of the country according to the lack and necessities of the citizens in those states. Some times, the government can give more rations to one place than the other, and people are going to claim. If the portions are constant and it is a fair amount of food, people express gratitude and sympathy to the government. On the other hand, if people do not think that way, it can create discontent.
That would be the textile industry
Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
Aristotle tutored alexander the great and went to plato's academy in athens, greece.
