1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler79 [48]
3 years ago
8

Addressing public policies are an important job of citizen and members of government in any society. What are the three stages o

f defining and solving a public policy issue?
Social Studies
2 answers:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The three stages of Public policies are

  • Agenda setting
  • Policy Formulation
  • Adoption
  • Implementation
  • Evaluation

Explanation:

Howlett and Ramesh’s model identifies five stages: agenda setting, policy

formulation, adoption (or decision making), implementation and evaluation. Let us briefly examine each of these stages.

AGENDA SETTING

This stage refers to the process through which a policy and the problem it is intended to address are acknowledged to be of public interest. Some

authors differentiate among several types of agendas, including discussion agendas and decision agendas.

POLICY FORMULATION

At this stage, the public administration concerned examines the various policy options it considers to be possible solutions. It should be noted that

coalitions of actors strive, through the use of advocacy strategies, to gain priority for one specific interpretation of both the problem and its solution. It

is at this stage that power relationships crystallize, determining the direction a policy will take.

ADOPTION

Adoption is the stage during which decisions are made at the governmental level, resulting in a decision that favours one or more approaches to addressing a given problem.

IMPLEMENTATION

At this stage, the policy’s implementation parameters are established, which can directly affect the eventual outcome of the policy. Several factors combine to determine the actual effects of a policy and how well it achieves its objectives. Factors noted by Sabatier and Mazmanian include:

  • The type and complexity of the problem addressed;
  • The magnitude of the expected change and the groups targeted by the policy;
  • The human and financial resources devoted to implementation, and;
  • The administrative structures and regulations that will be put in place to support implementation of the policy (Sabatier & Mazmanian, 1995).

EVALUATION

This is the stage during which a policy is evaluated, to verify whether its implementation and its effects are aligned with the objectives that were explicitly or implicitly set out. This evaluation can be carried out by the government apparatus, by consultants or by civil society (Howlett & Ramesh, 2003).

Cerrena [4.2K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

(1). Agenda setting,

(2). Policy Formulation and

(3). Policy Adoption and Policy implementation.

Explanation:

There are many problems or issues to be solved so when the leaders or government of a particular state or country decides to set up policies to tackle or counter the effect of this problems we say that they are making Public policies. There are process at which Public policies undergo and they are; (1). Agenda setting(the issue is said to be an important issue to be solved), (2). Policy Formulation (solutions are being proposed in this stage) and (3). Policy Adoption and Policy Implementation.

You might be interested in
Razia was appointed the sultan because she was more able and qualified than all her brothers. Yet she was dethroned after 4 year
Lorico [155]

Gender-equality will help make a society wealthier, improve freedom, strengthen families, improve democracy, promote peace, reduce violence and increase the odds of satisfying orgasms.

Settle down and I’ll tell you more about it.

Filling roles with the person who is best qualified rather than the person who is best qualified and the “right” gender means on the average getting better qualified people. Relative to a strictly gender-segregated society a gender-equal one has twice the talent-pool available for all jobs.

Gender-equality increases freedom since it gives individuals the freedom to do anything they want to do, rather than limit them arbitrarily to a subset of activities judged “appropriate” for their gender.

Gender-equality increases the resilience and flexibility of families. In a family with strict gender-roles odds are only the husband has a income, and only the wife has experience and expertise in handling household-chores. A gender-equal family in contrast frequently has 2 adults who both have a income and are both able to take competently care of the household. This makes them a lot better equipped to handle life’s curve-balls.

Gender-equality strengthens democracy. The entire point of Democracy is that the people hold the ultimate power in a society. It should be fairly obvious why excluding half of humanity from equal participation in running society by necessity weakens democracy, relative to letting all genders contribute equally.

Gender-equality promotes peace and reduces violence: “research has found robust support for a relationship between gender inequality and civil war. These results all point in the same direction; countries that display lower levels of gender equality are more likely to become involved in civil conflict, and violence is likely to be even more severe, than in countries where women have a higher status.” (note that this remains true even after compensating for GDP/capita)

Better gender-equality gives (heterosexual) women more, and better, orgasms.[1] This might not, strictly speaking, be hugely important to social organization (except perhaps by increasing women’s average happiness), but I wanted to mention it anyway, because really gender-equality is one of those things that are win-win-win all around for everyone.

The list of benefits of better gender-equality is much longer than this, I feel as if I could comfortably write an entire novel about the numerous benefits, large and small, of better gender-equality.

I could talk about improvements in the lives of homosexual people, about fathers who knows their children, about mothers with a career, about saving money, about being a teenager in a more gender-equal society, about civil rights, about reduction of crime, about lower child-poverty, about better mental health, about tolerance and acceptance, about a endless list of things.

But I think the above is enough.

I’d like to add though that most of the list above is true for ALL types of equality, not just gender-equality. We should not be so hung up on gender that we forget about or ignore other axes of discrimination such as race, religion, or disability

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify two things that totalltarlan leaders use to ellminate challenges to their rule. Select all that apply.
ladessa [460]

Answer:

Secret Police and The military.

Explanation: Think of the gestapo, the SS (Hitlers guards)

Secret service wont work as that is a democratic agency of the POTUS.

Gov officials aid the dictator in rule or get thrown in prison/executed.

6 0
3 years ago
What are the correct qualities of a poet
Nady [450]
There really arent correct qualities of a poet. Each poet will have different qualities. 
6 0
2 years ago
What is the difference between a biological and a social view of race?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

Racism is founded in part on the belief that race is a biological phenomenon. As a result, biological differences become an explanation for social differences. In genetics, social distinctions become naturalized.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jussef is a whiz at spelling. He has won multiple local and regional spelling bees. When he moves to a new state, he makes frien
djyliett [7]

Dissonance

Explanation:

In cognitive dissonance, once feels inferior that id there is this imbalance feeling that one has in which they do, say or think things that usually do not fit with our already made traditions, beliefs, opinions or values, and mostly we are uncomfortable as a result of it.

It is simply known to be Inconsistency between beliefs and its action lead to mental stress of that individual.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Wh were the People conquered by Cortes
    7·1 answer
  • Darley and Latané (1968) believe that the presence of other people in a distressing situation decreased the likelihood that they
    13·1 answer
  • A counselor helping a young adult client with procrastination must recognize that this problem can have many sources. in young a
    7·1 answer
  • Help me please..........
    11·1 answer
  • Name 3 ways that the county government can be organized
    8·1 answer
  • Prejudice: A. always results in discrimination. B. may or may not result in discrimination. C. is the result of discrimination.
    8·2 answers
  • Ethical theory grounds and justifies our moral decisions. Which ethical theory most closely approximates the considerations you
    7·1 answer
  • What is the difference between apostles and disciples
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Europeans want to establish trading posts in India?
    5·1 answer
  • The international debt crisis of early 1982 was precipitated when ________ could not pay its international debts.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!