This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question
Based on your reading of the Challenger case, do you think the advocacy or inquiry approach dominated the decision-making process?
Answer: advocacy approach
Explanation:
The fact that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had dismissed probabilistic risk analyses has been pointed out as the main cause of the Challenger catastrophe. In this case, advocacy dominated the inquiry approach, as management didn´t allow further inquires in probabilistic risk analysis, prioritizing the design-oriented approach that predominated in NASA during the 1970s.
Answer:
Realistic
Explanation:
The cultivation analysis posit that when someone constantly watches the television at a frequently high rate, such person tends to believe the scenes and informations gotten from watching the television to be real and valid. This informs the person's perception about the real world and subsequent behavioural pattern
Answer:
I think b no is the correct ans
<u>Answer:
</u>
Depending on the data regarding the air quality indices, the changes can be chosen to be incorporated or not incorporated.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The change in the air quality indices and its effect on the national income would be needed to be devised correctly if it has to be incorporated.
- The data obtained on air quality is highly vulnerable to fluctuation based on the methods of data collection.
- As it is difficult to measure the impact of changed air quality indices on the economy, its incorporation in national income is also difficult.
