The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Hey there,
Answer :
<span>The supreme court has become more diverse with the appointments of Thurgood Marshall and Sandra Day o'Commor.
</span>
Hope this helps :D
<em>~Top♥</em>
Put it through word check to make sure no words are spelled wrong. Make sure you used proper grammar and have a friend or a parent read it to make sure it makes sense to them.
One feature that helped the U.S. grow in industry was the inovation.
The position that the strict constructionists take in the
early years under the constitution is that the congress had the power of which
only listed in the article 2, section 8, and clause 1-17. Whereas the liberal constructionists
would have their congress to stench their power with the use of the elastic
clause, known as clause 18.
