Question

Under our Constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. Freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots.
Which is the best summary of the passage? (apex)

Answer 1

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

It is stating that free speech would not truly exist if the right to use it could only be exercised in a specific area.