Question:
If an utility company were considering an increase in electricity or gas prices in order to cover the costs of a capital investment, this sector would result in the smallest change in quantity demanded in the long run and thus higher profits. True or false?
Answer:
The answer is True.
Explanation:
Change in the demand for gasoline and or electricity is primarily set by the number of industrial or bulk users.
Scarce goods are allocated though the help of prices. It is important to note that demand for gasoline or electricity is <u>more elastic in the long term</u>, so small changes in price will alter supply and demand in either direction in the shortrun.
The demand for gas or electricity are by nature <em><u>inelastic.</u></em> This means that when prices go up, demand goes down <em><u>but not by much.</u></em>
It means that in the short term, the individuals cannot alter their lifestyle immediately to adjust for the hike in prices.
To adjust they would have to probably purchase new devices which or cars which consume less gas or electricity.
The effect this has for the company on the overall is that they are able to achieve their aim of recouping their capital investments from the planned increase in price.
Cheers!
To learn how people are searching online, a keyword analysis would be most relevant.
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
team
Explanation:
Using a <em>team </em>of employees for tasks that are cross-department based is a better solution than letting each individual work on a task and just ask other departments for reference and help if needed. When working on important projects such as this one, the most efficient way is to put employees from the tackled departments into one team. This way, communication and collaboration is vastly improved.
We may understand criminal behavior and thus be able to prevent crime.
