<u>Answer:
</u>
Bertha is involved in controlled mental processing as she is rubbing her belly and patting her head at the same time.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The action that Bertha is performing is entirely under her physical and mental control and there are no signs of unconscious initiation.
- Because Bertha is fully conscious of her actions, she can anytime terminate the action or change it to some other completely different gesture.
- Hence, no signs of unconscious initiation and involvement clarify that Bertha is involved in controlled mental processing.
Answer:
<u>a. rule utilitarianism</u>
Explanation:
<u>Rule utilitarianism: </u>The term "rule utilitarianism" is described as one of the different forms of utilitarianism that determines a particular action is right as it conforming to a rule that tend to lead the "greatest good", or that the wrongness or rightness of a specific action is considered as a function of the "correctness" of the rule to which it is signified as an instance.
<u>In the question above, the given statement represents "rule utilitarianism".</u>
Answer:
In the 15th century BCE, Hurrians from Mitanni sacked Ashur and made Assyria a vassal. ... His son Tukulti-Ninurta I (reigned 1243–1207 BCE) conquered Babylon, putting its King Bitilyasu to death, and thereby made Assyria the dominant power in Mesopotamia.
Explanation:
The answer in the space provided in the sentence above is
wampum, this is the material that the woodlands people used in keeping records
or exchange conclusion of treaties. Wampum is small cylindrical beads used for
either as a decorative display, accessory or they could also use this as their
own money.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
