Answer:
$12,000
Explanation:
The manufacturing company has a direct materials cost of $6
The company manufactures 2,000 unit
Therefore total direct material cost can be calculated as follows
= 2,000×6
= $12,000
Hence the total direct material cost of $12,000
Answer:
look i don't care...
Explanation:
just joking i don't know that question
Answer:
b. In the first economy, the spending multiplier is greater than in the second economy. In the third economy, the spending multiplier is undefined
Explanation:
This can be easily understood by going through some calculations in a spending multiplier formula.
WORKINGS
The formula for Spending Multiplier = 
Spending Multiplier
Economy 1: Multiplier = 
= 2
Economy 2: Multiplier = 
= 1
Economy 3: Multiplier = 
= undefined
Note: MPS can be abbreviated as Marginal propensity to save
As we can see here economy 1 is 50% greater than economy 2 and economy 3 is undefined because they spend whole dollar they earn additionally.
On behalf of the above calculations, option B is a perfect match!
Answer:
D. The auditor should assess the risks of material mis-statement due to fraud.
Explanation:
At the time of auditor visit in a company the financial statement represent that the company has done the fraud in this scenario, the auditor should analyze the material misstatement risk that is done for fraud
Therefore in the given case, the option D is correct as the auditor responsibility is that he or she should analyze the risk with respect to the false statements presented in the financial statement
Hello there!
There is quite a HUGE difference between these both. When being frauded or making a fraud, this would also be known as stealing money.
But when making a mistake in a statement, they can be things resolved faster than if a person were to steal money. When making this mistake, you could resolve this by explaining why this was a mistake and also what could you do to fix it as well.
Both of these kind of acts are seriously two major different things, they have nothing in common.
